By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!I personally wouldn't mess around with this. No intercooler.... stock injectors.... no engine management.... come on, what is this... and for estimated 310whp lol Ill pass.
Turbos belong under the hood anyway. 35r FTMFW
Boost is boost? There's more to making horsepower in the forced induction world than pressure levels... It's all about CFM.
IMO, FMU, stock injectors, and an inline pump for fueling sounds like a bad idea to me.
With out throwing a million other variables into the mix yes CFM, Air Density of the Charge, Diameter of the compresser out, Cylinder head porting ( the head can flow only so much), etc... all will make a differance.
Also the higher the CFM output the bigger the turbo & the larger the lag. Id think that a large turbo in the rear of the truck to make a 70 + HP difference over a rotrex/m90 blower will have some HUGE lag...
Oh yeah, I like intercoolers too.
:rock:
Yeah that I agree with I am strictly comparing the STS kit to our current supercharger kits..
How much power do you think our blowers leach? Maybe 20 HP?
I dunno man I cant see the STS making 70 HP more, turbo or not.
The #'s in the dyno sheet are the real #'s according to STS. BTW if you make your decision off what STS says then you would be making an uninformed decision.I agree with you BSPX. I just think all these guy are bias... UNTIL you see real numers, i say don't run your mouth... I know there are a whole mess of you that probably know way more than i do, but I'm not making an uninformed decision. I'm going to wait and see what kind of REAL number the STS kit puts out before i make decision.
The #'s in the dyno sheet are the real #'s according to STS. BTW if you make your decision off what STS says then you would be making an uninformed decision.