I am at a complete loss to understand why you would go on and on about why URD can't get CARB certification and quote all that stuff. Yes, I know that end user tunabilty cannot be CARB approved. I so stated that when I wote that end user tunability would have to locked down when we start shipping CARB certified kits.
Not everyone else knows or understands this, I assme when writing this that no one knows. That way all the information is clear and concise.
Again, what is keeping us from seeking CARB approval is the carbon trap issue.
So we can conclude that this issue will be resolved? And CARB approval will be granted?
Basically you spent a lot of time typing and stating what I did in just a couple of sentences, but thanks for verifying what we already knew.
We all know you know the system inside and out, and so you should, you sell it!, but my time writing this is well spent so other people understand what was explained. I have seen no other threads with this kind of information in it.
Now as far as comparing stock system to stock system on a completely stock truck, I based my comparison on a dyno chart that was published on one of these forums very shortly after the TRD system was released. I had to dig out my notes and reviewed them. I will have to admit I was wrong when I posted that. I will correct myself. The URD made the same power as the dyno chart posted on the stock TRD system at 2000 RPM, again at 2500 RPM and then started making more power at 3000 RPM.
2000 100/100
2500 130/130
3000 160/170
3500 183/210
4000 205/245
4500 225/280
5000 240/300
5500 250/316
It is hard to find a dyno with an unmodified system and a completely stock truck. The chart you posted and referenced was from a truck with modifications and is not relivent to the point.
TRD did the SAE J1349 dyno test which is the most accurate power test available. And many hours were spent testing with it to ensure accuracy. Perhaps you have similiar engine dyno data?
The intercooler data came straight from TRD rep. I will be doing some testing soon to see if it is accurate or not.
This source at TRD is not reliable? 20 degree temperature sounds like an arbitrary number. It would be pointless for that kind of gradient, I will check the calculations in my books for the measured surface area of the intercooler and the intake charge temperature. Even if it was only 20, wouldn't there be severe ping otherwise? I know with the URD system its almost unnecessary for the intercooler because of the adiabatic efficiency of the compressor. Definitely a plus.
We are working hard on some nice power enhancements for the good folks with the TRD system that I think they are going to enjoy. I spent most of the day yesterday mapping out a TRD system with three different intakes with a MAP-ECU2. Improvements were made, but there is still some work left to do.
As far as modified systems go the highest published peak power dyno go to URD.
At what RPM was the peak number? I haven't seen the graph to properly compare.
I have made a few mods to supercharger on my truck. As soon as I get some more parts in, I will get it on a dyno and see how much of an improvement there is. My goal is to stay 1 HP more then Jonathan.
Can I ask why you are comparing to Jonathon's? There are many other people with TRD s/c's. I believe ntinhri has a pulley and same system as well.
Gadget