Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

URD vs TRD Supercharger Info & Stats

Status
Not open for further replies.

LSKustumz

New Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
377
Reaction score
0
Am I only the one that finds these comparisons pointless?????? There are so many variables in all this is isn't even funny anymore.:smile:
Can we compare a screw type supercharger to a turbo next:dontknow::laugh:
Has anybody run both these systems side by side as they come out the box with no other mods? IMO thats the only way to get a good comparison. 0-60 1/4 0-100 should all be looked at. The same driver would have to run each a few times then average the #'s for true consistent times.:top: Or are we simply talking who's sytem makes the most HP? :dontknow:

I see your point. Its more of an analysis of facts and observations and differences. So the people in the market for a supercharger have the most information available to them. Not everyone knows the differences of the rotrex and roots type. All they here 300hp this , 310hp that. Sometimes, you have to void out all the static and compare facts to facts.
 

5H4D0WD347H

New Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
10,450
Reaction score
0
Am I only the one that finds these comparisons pointless?????? There are so many variables in all this is isn't even funny anymore.:smile:
Can we compare a screw type supercharger to a turbo next:dontknow::laugh:
Has anybody run both these systems side by side as they come out the box with no other mods? IMO thats the only way to get a good comparison. 0-60 1/4 0-100 should all be looked at. The same driver would have to run each a few times then average the #'s for true consistent times.:top: Or are we simply talking who's sytem makes the most HP? :dontknow:

Where are those graphs at?

I see your point. Its more of an analysis of facts and observations and differences. So the people in the market for a supercharger have the most information available to them. Not everyone knows the differences of the rotrex and roots type. All they here 300hp this , 310hp that. Sometimes, you have to void out all the static and compare facts to facts.

Exactly. Id really like two graphs to compare the curve between the TRD with a CAI and a URD setup.

What I love about the TRD kit is that at around 1,800 RPMs if I stomp on it the boost comes right up.
 

xrunnrcanada

New Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2008
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
Couple pros and cons for each, personally i'd pick up the trd but i havent seen either application. All i know is TRD puts some serious engineering into parts to maintain factory warranty. That and they build some serious race engines. Roots typically have a longer life span and instant power curve, better for towin and race applications. As technology advances i'd sooner have a power mod engineered for one specific application.
http://www.superchargersonline.com/content.asp?id=5
 

RedXr

New Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2008
Messages
2,744
Reaction score
0
id kinda like to see those urd graphs also:smile:...please!?
 

LSKustumz

New Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
377
Reaction score
0
Where are those graphs at?



Exactly. Id really like two graphs to compare the curve between the TRD with a CAI and a URD setup.

What I love about the TRD kit is that at around 1,800 RPMs if I stomp on it the boost comes right up.

Exactly!! This is how my SR was, and made driving an absolute blast! When we drive we are not at 4k RPM all the time, we spend most of our driving time between 1k-3.5K, and the TRD charger makes peak torque at about 2.6K. Man.... makes me hurry in getting one even more, dang you DS!!!!:eviltongue:

Couple pros and cons for each, personally i'd pick up the trd but i havent seen either application. All i know is TRD puts some serious engineering into parts to maintain factory warranty. That and they build some serious race engines. Roots typically have a longer life span and instant power curve, better for towin and race applications. As technology advances i'd sooner have a power mod engineered for one specific application.
http://www.superchargersonline.com/content.asp?id=5

Nice find. :top:
 

trd_sport

Active Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
6,563
Reaction score
1
Where are those graphs at?
graphs for what?
Different dynos will read differently. The numbers between the two systems are very close...I honestly cant say one is better than the other based on graphs. There is so much to consider besides the #'s IMO.
 

2006nightrider

Active Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2007
Messages
9,424
Reaction score
0
I would of bought either kit, but the TRD wasnt out last year when I wanted to be blown...so I went with the URD. Both have great performance #'s, so either kit IMO is great...

I've seen the TRD in person, its a really nice kit (especially when you have powdercoated covers- DS & Jon :eviltongue:), but I LOVE the way the URD kit sounds. I like the whine of the TRD, but nothin beats the wssssssshhhhhhhhhhh noise...IMO. I love the way a turbo sounds, and the URD is as close as I can get right now.

I know what I just said now doesnt help anyone compare the 2 kits...just my .02
 

RedXr

New Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2008
Messages
2,744
Reaction score
0
didnt one of you gents over in VA have an onboard race vid of the trd and urd?
 

TitanRattler813

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2007
Messages
7,656
Reaction score
33
Everytime these URD/TRD S/C threads come up I see it downplayed as analysis of facts, fair comparison, blah blah, but honestly reading from beginning to end this doesn't come across as an objective comparison at all. I don't have either one and I personally know if I was to choose, which one I would buy, but if I was shopping and read through a lot of these debates the impression I would get is that URD is the pioneer, TRD is the sh1t, and the TRD fans try to make the URD seem inferior and want Gadget to prove otherwise.

This is an outsider talking here. I'm not supercharged and won't be for quite some years down the line... but that's the vibe I usually get from these "discussions"
 

5H4D0WD347H

New Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
10,450
Reaction score
0
lol its all in fun dude. With out debates it would get boring around here!

Everyone is going to love their own brand.

As long as everyone gets a balloon to take home at the end of the day there is no hard feelings (not here at least).
 

LSKustumz

New Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
377
Reaction score
0
Everytime these URD/TRD S/C threads come up I see it downplayed as analysis of facts, fair comparison, blah blah, but honestly reading from beginning to end this doesn't come across as an objective comparison at all. I don't have either one and I personally know if I was to choose, which one I would buy, but if I was shopping and read through a lot of these debates the impression I would get is that URD is the pioneer, TRD is the sh1t, and the TRD fans try to make the URD seem inferior and want Gadget to prove otherwise.

This is an outsider talking here. I'm not supercharged and won't be for quite some years down the line... but that's the vibe I usually get from these "discussions"

Your not the only that feels this way. Many do. Many choose not to participate in these discussions because it becomes a political discussion. I think we need to keep the posts pertaining to facts. And if it points towards one or the other, then so be it. But I wouldn't go as far to say that were taking a magnifying glass to URD. When your on these forums and sell a product to the community, scrutiny is always going to be present. Here we are formulating information for consumers. Not bad-talking URD. We all know that URD was the first to release a s/c kit, and it worked great and many happy boosted people.
 

5H4D0WD347H

New Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
10,450
Reaction score
0
URD also continues to produce products for TRD customers as well. Ive given gadget props before for continuously trying to produce more things for these trucks.
 

TitanRattler813

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2007
Messages
7,656
Reaction score
33
lol its all in fun dude. With out debates it would get boring around here!

Everyone is going to love their own brand.

As long as everyone gets a balloon to take home at the end of the day there is no hard feelings (not here at least).

Your not the only that feels this way. Many do. Many choose not to participate in these discussions because it becomes a political discussion. I think we need to keep the posts pertaining to facts. And if it points towards one or the other, then so be it. But I wouldn't go as far to say that were taking a magnifying glass to URD. When your on these forums and sell a product to the community, scrutiny is always going to be present. Here we are formulating information for consumers. Not bad-talking URD. We all know that URD was the first to release a s/c kit, and it worked great and many happy boosted people.

URD also continues to produce products for TRD customers as well. Ive given gadget props before for continuously trying to produce more things for these trucks.

points taken ... I've been around the site long enough to see that this goes on with any number of competing products from different vendors in the same genre. (the same way the C2C kit got bashed for a short while), issues with URD Trac Bar, etc.... I'd just hate to see that whole scenario play out again that's all. I also respect the fact how both Jon (C2C) and Gadget (URD) have been selective in choosing what and when to contribute in these types of things. They both leave their personal feelings out and only correct the false information without getting caught up in the back and forth "a is better than b" and vice versa. I'm not trying to persuade anyone to keep opinions to themselves because that's really what we're all here for anyway ... just giving my perspective on the whole thing.

Now let the fun continue ... :smile:.

Besides, we all know DS likes to keep sh1t stirred up anyway :laugh:
 

5H4D0WD347H

New Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
10,450
Reaction score
0
Keep stirring that pot!!!! If I don't stir it someone else will!

Everyone should be able to have a civil conversation and discuss the facts between each kit with out exaggerated claims/numbers, personal feelings, and girl fights IMO.

Weather you are a vendor, an admin/mod, or a member.

No one can say anyones choice, style, or opinion is wrong. However facts are facts and there are always tools, products, and food in life that are better then the next one.

That is the route of this thread. Which kit has more pros & in which in turn out weighs the other? Then ultimately what one comes out on top?

So if you have a claim to make it should be backed up with data accordingly.

To many people in life are quiet. Speak up! There will always be a peepee contest lol.

And the battle rages on...
 
Last edited:

LSKustumz

New Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
377
Reaction score
0
Keep stirring that pot!!!! If I don't stir it someone else will!

Everyone should be able to have a civil conversation and discuss the facts between each kit with out exaggerated claims/numbers, personal feelings, and girl fights IMO.

Weather you are a vendor, an admin/mod, or a member.

No one can say anyones choice, style, or opinion is wrong. However facts are facts and there are always tools, products, and food in life that are better then the next one.

That is the route of this thread. Which kit has more pros & in which in turn out weighs the other? Then ultimately what one comes out on top?

So if you have a claim to make it should be backed up with data accordingly.

To many people in life are quiet. Speak up! There will always be a peepee contest lol.

And the battle rages on...

Nicely stated!!




But I have to say... peepee!? LOL :laugh:
 

metalheadx

Active Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2007
Messages
1,721
Reaction score
0
i have the trd s/c and love it but there both great chargers
 

TitanRattler813

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2007
Messages
7,656
Reaction score
33
Everyone should be able to have a civil conversation and discuss the facts between each kit with out exaggerated claims/numbers, personal feelings, and girl fights IMO.
...
That is the route of this thread. Which kit has more pros & in which in turn out weighs the other? Then ultimately what one comes out on top?

So if you have a claim to make it should be backed up with data accordingly.
...

i have the trd s/c and love it but there both great chargers
:laugh:... somebody wasn't paying attention in class today :damnmate:
 

Gadget

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2007
Messages
10,932
Reaction score
173
Originally Posted by Gadget
There are a few things that Doug Thorley rep posted that need to be corrected.

The TRD supercharger uses the Eaton M-90 rotor pack. It is the old 3 lob design. I corrected him in the past on this, but he keeps saying it is the newer 4 lobe TVS design and it is not.

I could be wrong, but at SEMA this what Magnuson specified, and what Eation had at their booth as well.

The URD system does not require tuning. We do give the end user the ability to tune if he wishes. The tuning software is shipped with the kit.

He is completely wrong about not being able to tune open loop. Open loop is what is tuned. The 4.0 goes into open loop very early compared to the older V6 and pretty much any time the engine is in boost the ECU is in open loop. The URD Performance Calibration Unit that is shipped with the kit gives you full control over anything that you will ever need to tune with this system.

The URD system is not CARB approved. The only thing keeping it from being is we are waiting on a ruling from CARB on the carbon trap issue. Once they make their ruling on what aftermarket solutions will be accepted to replace the stock carbon trap we will be able to obtain a CARB certification. If we start shipping CARB certified kits the end user access to the ECU tuning will be locked down.

How many years has your system been for sale without CARB approval? Because of your end user tunability it will not be able to pass CARB. If you allow adjustments to pulse width or anything to do with the addition of fuel to the system it has to be above a specified RPM. Dobeck's controller is getting a EO right now for this, because the adjustment range is so small and high up in the RPM range that it will not effect emissions at that RPM level. I believe this is notified in [FONT=Arial, Helvetica]Vehicle Code Section 27156 (VC 27156), I could be wrong.

You can look up a manufacture on ARB sites for EO numbers withheld by each company, here is the address

http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/aftermk...es/amquery.php

Here is a link to the ARB site for the 27156 regarding EO application.

http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/aftermkt/aftermkt.htm#ca


[/FONT]

If you compare the unmodified URD kit to the unmodified TRD kit, the URD starts making more power than the TRD at around 2000 RPM and ends up in the 50 HP range more.

I beg to differ. Here is the dyno graph of the TRD. Can you post the URD graph?

Installing the URD kit does not automatically void your trucks warranty. Just like installing a set of Doug Thorley headers will not.

This is the Moss Motor Act that you are thinking of. Headers are a performance market that has been around for years, and is AFTER the engine, does not affect the fuel curve of the stock ECU, have signal conditioners or calibrators attached to it. Your unit requires tying into the ECU does it not? And conditioning signals that are feeding into the ECU? Our headers do not. They just bolt on and flow. Although the PNP harnesses are SWEEET!! I think you are comparing apples and oranges there.


The URD intercooler reduces charge air temp by 70 degrees. The TRD one reduces charge air temp roughly 20 degrees according to TRD.

They claimed with the 3.4L a temperature drop of 32 degrees with the 7th injector setup, just squirting fuel dropped the temp, simple laws of thermodynamics. And you are saying their water-to-air intercooler is only doing 20 degree temperature drop? With the compression ratio of 10.4 they cannot afford to only have a 20 degree drop. There is a safety margin that must be accomplished in order for these to be warranted.

Both systems are very nice. Which ever one you chose you will not be disapointed.

Absolutely!! I am by no means slandering the URD kit, it is an excellent kit, with great adiabatic efficiency and top end power and design. It just depends where you want power, and maintaining smog legality and warranty. As with any product out on the market, all the facts should be laid out so the consumer can decide.
waytogo.gif


Gadget



I am at a complete loss to understand why you would go on and on about why URD can't get CARB certification and quote all that stuff. Yes, I know that end user tunabilty cannot be CARB approved. I so stated that when I wote that end user tunability would have to locked down when we start shipping CARB certified kits.

Again, what is keeping us from seeking CARB approval is the carbon trap issue.

Basically you spent a lot of time typing and stating what I did in just a couple of sentences, but thanks for verifying what we already knew.

Now as far as comparing stock system to stock system on a completely stock truck, I based my comparison on a dyno chart that was published on one of these forums very shortly after the TRD system was released. I had to dig out my notes and reviewed them. I will have to admit I was wrong when I posted that. I will correct myself. The URD made the same power as the dyno chart posted on the stock TRD system at 2000 RPM, again at 2500 RPM and then started making more power at 3000 RPM.


2000 100/100
2500 130/130
3000 160/170
3500 183/210
4000 205/245
4500 225/280
5000 240/300
5500 250/316

It is hard to find a dyno with an unmodified system and a completely stock truck. The chart you posted and referenced was from a truck with modifications and is not relivent to the point.

The intercooler data came straight from TRD rep. I will be doing some testing soon to see if it is accurate or not.

We are working hard on some nice power enhancements for the good folks with the TRD system that I think they are going to enjoy. I spent most of the day yesterday mapping out a TRD system with three different intakes with a MAP-ECU2. Improvements were made, but there is still some work left to do.

As far as modified systems go the highest published peak power dyno go to URD.

I have made a few mods to supercharger on my truck. As soon as I get some more parts in, I will get it on a dyno and see how much of an improvement there is. My goal is to stay 1 HP more then Jonathan.

Gadget
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom